Forecasting Patient-Specific Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry with Mixed-Effects Models.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2026
Publication Title
Diagnostics
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surveillance is based largely on monitoring the maximum diameter, a single scalar metric that obscures regional remodeling and offers limited information on the location and time dependency of the growth rate. The present work addresses this limitation with a geometry-based patient-specific framework that learns local, linear evolution from longitudinal clinical imaging, yielding 3D forecasts of AAA geometry at arbitrary future times.
Methods: Lumen and outer wall surfaces are represented on a centerline-anchored cylindrical grid, with subsequent implementation of individualized linear mixed-effects models. The model is explicitly interpretable as the fixed effects predict global trends and the random effects represent regional heterogeneity. In a multicenter cohort of 79 patients, we evaluated forecasts using spatial similarity (with the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance-HD95) and clinically relevant global geometric scalars such as maximum diameter and volume.
Results: When forecasting a future AAA geometry, the model achieved sub-millimetric HD95 spatial errors and less than 6% error for the aforementioned global scalars. The model was deployed in an interactive application named the Aneurysm Forecasting Studio, which allows a user to visualize the AAA in an explorable forecast space.
Conclusions: During typical clinical surveillance intervals, AAA geometric remodeling is reasonably approximated as locally linear in time, enabling transparent, fast forecasts that support surveillance optimization, threshold timing, and digital twin-based interventional planning.
Volume
16
Issue
9
First Page
1409
Last Page
1409
Recommended Citation
Restrepo JC, Bolanos ML, Baek S, Muluk SC, Eskandari MK, Kashyap VS, et al. [Yassa E]. Forecasting patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry with mixed-effects models. Diagnostics. 2026;16(9). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics16091409. PMID: 42122111.
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics16091409.
ISSN
2075-4418
PubMed ID
42122111