Improved outcomes with robotic-assisted laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs compared with laparoscopic and transthoracic approaches: A single high-volume institution experience.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-25-2025
Publication Title
JTCVS Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic (lap) paraesophageal hernia repair has excellent short-term outcomes but higher long-term recurrence rates compared with the transthoracic repair. We hypothesized that the robotic-assisted lap (robot) approach would have similarly good short-term outcomes as lap, but also lower recurrence rates.
METHODS: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was performed for paraesophageal hernia repairs at a single high-volume quaternary hospital from July 2018 to September 2022. Outcomes analyzed included 2-year postoperative radiographic recurrence (Rad), Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined radiographic recurrence (STS-rad), symptomatic recurrence (Sx), and perioperative outcomes. Lap, robot, and transthoracic groups were compared using univariate, multivariate, and propensity score analysis.
RESULTS: Among 207 cases (52 lap, 90 robot, and 65 transthoracic), robot was lower than lap (odds ratio [OR], 0.13-0.17;
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic paraesophageal hernia repairs had generally lower 2-year recurrence and reoperation than lap and shorter hospital stays and fewer immediate complications than transthoracic.
Volume
26
First Page
255
Last Page
265
Recommended Citation
Ward KR, Bui J, Bondarenko I, Chang A, Lagisetty K, Lin J et al Improved outcomes with robotic-assisted laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs compared with laparoscopic and transthoracic approaches: A single high-volume institution experience. JTCVS Open. 2025 Jun 25;26:255-265. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.016. PMID: 40923072
DOI
10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.016
ISSN
2666-2736
PubMed ID
40923072