Comparison of Diagnostic Bronchoscopy Single-Arm Trials Using an Advanced Optimization Approach for Indirect Comparisons with Partial Individual Patient Data.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2025

Publication Title

Respiration

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic yield of lung biopsy modalities is often compared using data from single-arm studies. These comparisons are biased due to differences in study populations, institutional practices, and diagnostic yield definitions. While individual patient data may be useful to account for some of these co-variables, individual patient data may only be available for one study. What is the difference in the primary outcome between two single-arm studies that utilized different bronchoscopy technologies?

METHODS: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis was performed comparing individual patient data from a retrospective multicenter cohort of consecutive RAB procedures to aggregate patient data in a prospective, multicenter clinical study of ENB procedures. The diagnostic yield was first calculated with the definition used in the comparator study, determined at 12 months after initial biopsy, with lost to follow-up excluded from the denominator (method 1), and second with a strict definition, determined at the time of bronchoscopy and nonspecific benign findings excluded (method 2).

RESULTS: Using method 1, the weighted diagnostic yield for RAB (87.1%) was significantly higher than for ENB (72.9%) (p < 0.001). Using method 2, the weighted diagnostic yield for RAB (64.9%) was also significantly higher than for ENB (50.6%) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: An optimization-based weighting approach for indirect comparisons between single-arm studies confirmed a significantly higher diagnostic yield for RAB compared to ENB. When using method 2, it was demonstrated that various factors significantly influence the diagnostic yield of RAB, highlighting the need for balancing to mitigate confounding effects, and ideally, randomized controlled trials.

First Page

1

Last Page

10

DOI

10.1159/000547686

ISSN

1423-0356

PubMed ID

40730137

Share

COinS