Relative Contribution of High Dose Outliers to Cumulative Occupational Radiation Dose in the Catheterization Laboratory
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
10-2025
Publication Title
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Abstract
Background: Among pulmonary embolism (PE) patients evaluated for catheter-directed therapy (CDT), predictors of treatment response are limited. While a ≥25% drop in mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure defines response, decision to treat often relies on clinical judgment and noninvasive tools (sPESI, CPES). We compared pre-treatment invasive hemodynamics and noninvasive markers in predicting CDT response.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 21 PE patients treated with CDT and Swan-Ganz catheter monitoring between 2022–2025. Treatment response was defined as ≥25% PA pressure reduction. Initial invasive hemodynamics (RA, CI, MvO2, PAPI, RV-CPO, RV-MPS [=PAPI×CPO×1.5]) and noninvasive markers (sPESI, CPES, troponin, RV/LV ratio) were analyzed using t-tests between responders and non-responders.
Results: CPES was the only noninvasive marker significantly different (5 vs 4, p=0.027); sPESI, troponin, RV/LV ratio were not associated with response. In contrast, invasive metrics were strongly associated with response: PA mean filling pressure (35 vs 23.5, p=0.001), MvO2 (59 vs 70.65, p=0.042), PAPI (1.79 vs 4.42, p=0.004), and RV-MPS (0.23 vs 0.41, p=0.007). Fick cardiac index was not associated with response to CDT.
Conclusion: Invasive hemodynamics—especially PA pressure, MvO2, PAPI, and RV-MPS— demonstrate a stronger and more consistent association than non-invasive markers. These findings support RV-PA coupling (the ratio of RV contractility to RV afterload) as a physiologic predictor of CDT response. CPES may aid selection, but non-invasive markers such as sPESI, RV/LV Ratio, troponin may not correspond with robust treatment response. Although further research is needed to assess recoupling dynamics post-intervention, our data suggest that initial invasive hemodynamic assessment can better stratify CDT responders versus non-responders.
Volume
86
Issue
17 Suppl
First Page
B454
Last Page
B455
Recommended Citation
Abiragi M, Fry L, VanOosterhout S, Joseph T, Sukul D, McNamara D, Madder R. Relative contribution of high dose outliers to cumulative occupational radiation dose in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;86(17 Suppl):B454-B5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1264.
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.1264
ISSN
1558-3597
Comments
American College of Cardiology Thirty-Seventh Annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics Symposium, October 25-28, 2025, San Francisco, CA
Frederik Meijer Heart & Vascular Institute