A Review of Concurrent Training Versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Training Cardiac Rehabilitation Modalities.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-3-2026
Publication Title
American journal of lifestyle medicine
Abstract
Moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) is the standard for exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Traditionally, resistance training has been used as an adjunctive modality; however, new evidence suggests aerobic exercise and resistance training are complementary, a combined approach called concurrent training (CT). The present review analyzed emergent scientific evidence of programmatic efficacy of CT vs MICT. Analyses focused on five primary outcomes: aerobic capacity, cardiovascular performance, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, recurrent cardiac events, and psychosocial changes. A PubMed search for eligible studies used Boolean phrases that included both sexes, CAD, MICT and CT treatment groups, 18-to-36 CR sessions, and both pre-post program measurements from two or more outcome categories. Sixteen investigations met eligibility criteria, and findings indicated strength gains with CT exceeded those of traditional MICT programming. Separately, patients assigned to CT demonstrated similar changes in VO
First Page
15598276261432129
Recommended Citation
Alfaro-Chaverri A, Trejos-Montoya J, Rojas-Ledezma M, Araya-Ramírez F, Franklin B, Quindry JC. A review of concurrent training versus moderate intensity continuous training cardiac rehabilitation modalities. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2026 Mar 3:15598276261432129. doi: 10.1177/15598276261432129. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41788915
DOI
10.1177/15598276261432129
ISSN
1559-8284
PubMed ID
41788915